The solution to the brouhaha of the moment is the relation of truth and
love. Jesus Christ revealed Himself to be the Truth: “I am the way, the truth,
and the life.” That is, His very Person
as Word is the Truth of the Father. Yet that Truth that He is, is pure Relation
to the Father: Love. That Relation is the Love that is the Spirit. The Son, Word-Truth, is
totally “for” the Father. Thus, Truth in
person is Love to death “for” the Other, and others. It is only here in Trinitarian Life that the conundrum of what we are dealing with - and why it is largely not understood - can be understood.
But we image it. Thus, to be faithful, you must be intransigent with truth even to death, and totally yielding in love to persons, even to death. And this, where death is Life. The Truth speaks: “This is my commandment, that you love one another as I have loved you. Greater love than this no one has, that one lay down his life for his friends. You are my friends if you do the things I command you” (Jn. 15, 12-15).
But we image it. Thus, to be faithful, you must be intransigent with truth even to death, and totally yielding in love to persons, even to death. And this, where death is Life. The Truth speaks: “This is my commandment, that you love one another as I have loved you. Greater love than this no one has, that one lay down his life for his friends. You are my friends if you do the things I command you” (Jn. 15, 12-15).
And so, divine Love and divine Truth are one and the same thing: the
Person of the Son in Jesus Christ. We are persons created in the image and
likeness of the Son, but, as created, finite and in-development. We become who
we are by incremental small steps of transcendent self-giving on the occasion of immanent contingent, historical, secular occasions of
ordinary life. And so, we must not yield on the truth of the person to be
self-gift, but serve that person - our own self-gif t - to make the gift.
In the case of the divorced-remarried, it would ipso facto violate the
truth of the first marriage – if valid – to receive communion, since to enter
into marriage when one is validly married violates the truth of the bond
already in place - the person/spouse already there as gift. To my mind, the large
solution is to consider the present state of matrimony, and whether people are
entering it with the animus of the gift, and if not, to confront the entire
evangelizing state of the Church. That is, as Vatican II was topsy-turvy from
the understanding of the Church as a People of God from a clerical model of sanctity
from top-down, this Synod becomes the defining moment for the requisite of sanctity
bottom-up from the family. The immensity of this is what I suspect the Spirit is about in the
Synod of 2015, and what Pope Francis anticipates. John Paul II and
Benedict XVI gave us the doctrinal
semantics of this. Francis is giving us the praxis.
If this appraisal is correct, then the Church is fundamentally restarting
in continuity with the beginnings of religious life in the fifth century.
Escriva makes mention of the parenthesis that was opened from that period to the founding of Opus Dei in the 20th
century.
No comments:
Post a Comment