Wedding: Sarah and Tom Krawczyk:
2/11/2012
2) John 2,
1-11: On the third day a wedding took place at
Cana in Galilee . Jesus’ mother was there, 2 and Jesus and his disciples had also been
invited to the wedding.3 When the wine was gone, Jesus’ mother said
to him, “They have no more wine.” 4 “Woman,[a] why
do you involve me?” Jesus
replied. “My
hour has not yet come.” 5 His mother
said to the servants, “Do whatever he tells you.” 6 Nearby stood
six stone water jars, the kind used by the Jews for ceremonial washing, each
holding from twenty to thirty gallons.[b] 7 Jesus said
to the servants, “Fill the jars
with water”; so they filled them to the brim. 8 Then he told
them, “Now draw some out and take
it to the master of the banquet.” They did so, 9 and the master of the banquet tasted
the water that had been turned into wine. He did not realize where it had come
from, though the servants who had drawn the water knew. Then he called the
bridegroom aside 10 and said, “Everyone brings out the
choice wine first and then the cheaper wine after the guests have had too much
to drink; but you have saved the best till now. 11 What Jesus
did here in Cana of Galilee was the first of
the signs through which he revealed his glory; and his disciples believed in
him.
From the first reading we see that Tobias
takes Sarah with purity of heart, i.e. for herself not for himself so that he
is not “take” but gift. Together they say “Amen. Amen.” Tom and Sarah chose
February 11 for the day of marriage, the feast of Our Lady of Lourdes where she
declared herself “the Immaculate Conception.” The Gospel reading is the
changing of water, filled to the brim (36 gallons) into excellent wine.
Christian
marriage is the changing of complementary opposites into one.
It is not forging compatible individuals into a unity. The
difference between the man and the woman is such that the ancient Greek
Pythagoreans thought that they were different species. Dietrich von Hildebrand
wrote that marriage was not the gift of friendship between two compatible
persons standing/walking side by side with a common interest, but rather facing
each other with an interpenetrating glance giving birth to a mysterious fusion
of their souls – making new wine. He wrote further that “the giving of self
[is] the specific characteristic of spousal love. “It is not simply a compound
of friendship and sensuality”[1]
but a unique communication of self gift. This is the meaning of human sexuality
and the prayer of Tobias and Sarah to become transformed into excellent wine as
one.
On the differences between men and women... (Dave Barry)
Let's say a guy named Roger
is
attracted to a woman named Elaine.
He asks her out to a movie; she accepts; they have a pretty good time. A few
nights later he asks her out to dinner, and again they enjoy themselves.
They continue to see each other regularly, and after a while neither one of
them is seeing anybody else. And then, one evening when they're driving
home, a thought occurs to Elaine, and, without really thinking, she says it
aloud:
"Do you realize that, as of tonight, we've been seeing each other for
exactly six months?" And then there is silence in the car. To Elaine, it
seems like a very loud silence. She thinks to herself: Gee, I wonder if it
bothers him that I said that. Maybe he's been feeling confined by our
relationship; maybe he thinks I'm trying to push him into some kind of
obligation that he doesn't want, or isn't sure of.
And Roger is thinking: Gosh. Six months.
And Elaine is thinking: But, hey, I'm not so sure I want this kind of
relationship, either. Sometimes I wish I had a little more space so I'd have
time to think about whether I really want us to keep going the way we are,
moving steadily toward ... I mean, where are we going? Are we just going to
keep seeing each other at this level of intimacy? Are we heading toward
marriage? Toward children? Toward a lifetime together? Am I ready for that level of commitment? Do I really even know this person?
And Roger is thinking: ... so that means it was... let's see.... February
when we started going out, which was right after I had the car at the
dealer's, which means ... lemme check the odometer ... Whoa! I am way
overdue for an oil change here.
And Elaine is thinking: He's upset. I can see it on his face. Maybe I'm
reading this completely wrong. Maybe he wants more from our relationship,
more intimacy, more commitment; maybe he has sensed-even before I sensed it-that I was feeling some reservations. Yes, I bet that's it. That's why
he's so reluctant to say anything about his own feelings. He's afraid of
being rejected….
attracted to a woman named Elaine.
He asks her out to a movie; she accepts; they have a pretty good time. A few
nights later he asks her out to dinner, and again they enjoy themselves.
They continue to see each other regularly, and after a while neither one of
them is seeing anybody else. And then, one evening when they're driving
home, a thought occurs to Elaine, and, without really thinking, she says it
aloud:
"Do you realize that, as of tonight, we've been seeing each other for
exactly six months?" And then there is silence in the car. To Elaine, it
seems like a very loud silence. She thinks to herself: Gee, I wonder if it
bothers him that I said that. Maybe he's been feeling confined by our
relationship; maybe he thinks I'm trying to push him into some kind of
obligation that he doesn't want, or isn't sure of.
And Roger is thinking: Gosh. Six months.
And Elaine is thinking: But, hey, I'm not so sure I want this kind of
relationship, either. Sometimes I wish I had a little more space so I'd have
time to think about whether I really want us to keep going the way we are,
moving steadily toward ... I mean, where are we going? Are we just going to
keep seeing each other at this level of intimacy? Are we heading toward
marriage? Toward children? Toward a lifetime together? Am I ready for that level of commitment? Do I really even know this person?
And Roger is thinking: ... so that means it was... let's see.... February
when we started going out, which was right after I had the car at the
dealer's, which means ... lemme check the odometer ... Whoa! I am way
overdue for an oil change here.
And Elaine is thinking: He's upset. I can see it on his face. Maybe I'm
reading this completely wrong. Maybe he wants more from our relationship,
more intimacy, more commitment; maybe he has sensed-even before I sensed it-that I was feeling some reservations. Yes, I bet that's it. That's why
he's so reluctant to say anything about his own feelings. He's afraid of
being rejected….
And Roger is thinking: And I'm gonna have them look at the transmission
again.
Conclusion: We are
really different!!
Opposites as Total Gift Not Mere Compatibilities: Roger and Elaine are the image of the divine reality of the
One God constituted by the three Persons who are not compatibilities but opposites.
The Rather is not the Son, the Son is not the Father (“The Father is greater
than I,” Jn. 14, 28; and yet “I and the Father are one,” Jn. 10, 30). In the
case of human persons like man and woman, a powerful metaphor is the
transformation of water, in jars filled to the brim, into a new and excellent
wine. “Filled to the brim” is the involvement of their whole selves.
The characteristic of marriage is
this totality – “to the brim” – which is the gift of oneself, not just
talents, time, money, attention, affection. Or even sex. The first one to speak
tin these terms, “self-gift” – was Dietrich von Hildebrand in 1929 and it was
echoed oby Karol Wojtyla in his “Love and Responsibility” and became the Church’s
definition of the human person in the Second Vatican Council where it said that
there is a parallel between the union of the Divine Persons and
human persons. Concretely, “man, the only earthly being God has loved
for itself, finds himself by the sincere gift of self. Wojtyla wrote:
“Spousal love differs from all other
aspects or forms of love… The essence of
spousal love is self-giving, the surrender of one’s ‘I. ’
This is something different from and more than attraction, desire or even good
will. These are all ways by which one person goes out towards another, but none
of them can take him as far in his quest for the good of the other as does
spousal love… When spousal love enters into this interpersonal relationship
something more than friendship results: two people give themselves to the
other.”[2]
You Never Marry the “Right” Person: Marriage is
not about the union of compatibiles and
self-fulfillment, but the gift of self: (nuclear fission).
Example: an allegory
"Leaf by Niggle:" (Only
by giving it all away do you get it all back +)
This gift of self could perhaps be best presented by J.R.R.Tolkien –author of “The Lord of the Rings” - in his “Leaf by
Niggle” that Sarah seemed to have enjoyed hearing in the retreat two weeks ago.
Niggle was a painter, an artist. In
his studio, he began working on painting a leaf that he saw in his imagination.
Soon the leaf became many leaves, then trees, then countryside and finally a
whole landscape.
Next door lived a poor man with a
sick wife and child. One rainy day, the neighbor asked Niggle if he had
anything that could be used to cover a hole in his roof since the rain was
coming in. Niggle had nothing at hand, and the poor man was beside himself with
anxiety. Suddenly, he realized that he had one thing: the large canvas on which
he was painting his leaves and the landscape, and into which he was pouring his
talents and self. Begrudgingly, he brought it next door, climbed the man’s roof
and nailed it over the hole.
Niggle then takes a trip – which is
really his death – and he overhears voices speaking sternly about him, the
facts of his life and conferring about his fate. He was mean at times and
sinful but a skilled artist: “a leaf by Niggle was a great work of art.”
Suddenly there is a kind voice that interrupts the somewhat harsh consultation
and reminds about the quality of a leaf by Niggle, and that Niggle had made a
gift of his master work ot cover a hole in his neighbor’s roof for protection
against the rain.
Niggle is then taken by train, with
his neighbor who had also died, out into the county. When the tan stops they
both step down and behold an immense countryside with grass nad water and trees
all bearing the prized leaves by Niggle. They entered and explored together
Niggle’s masterwork now become reality because he gave it away.
Is such a gift o self possible? Not
without Christ, and therefore not without the sacrament in which each of you is
the minister. You are uniquely here “priests of your own existence.” The
prototype of matrimony is the oneness – identity – of Christ and the Chruch
(Eph. 5, 25) for whom He gives all that He is as God-man which is the Mass we
are about to offer. And one-flesh union between Christ and the Church is the Eucharist that we are about to receive.
Therefore, it takes three to get married. Sarah, Tom and Jesus Christ in the
sacrament. My mission is simply to assist you in executing the sacrament as its
minister.
Finally,
the miracle of changing water into wine, which was the raising of marriage to a
Christian sacrament, was initiate ad by Our Lady whose feast we celebrate
today. May she preside in her humility over the miracle of this union of Sarah
and Tom. She is pleased. It snowed.
No comments:
Post a Comment