Go, figger!
We are awash in obligatory pro-homosexual spin by the media
of every stripe. And at the same time, and in total contradiction, the media is
incessantly scandalized at the homosexual activity between inevitably
consenting adults, i.e. men (priests being the preferable disclosure) and
teen-age boys.
It is not pedophilia.
I just came across an article recalling Maureen Dowd’s
affirmation of same, and wondering if she would be taken to task for connecting
the dots. Apparently not.
The New
York Times' Maureen Dowd's most recent anti-Catholic
hit piece (Sun., 5/19/11) contains a number of falsehoods.
However, her article's biggest eye-opener is her apparent claim that
homosexuality is a direct cause of child sex abuse.
Dowd's
article lashes out against New York Archbishop Timothy Dolan's stance against
the implementation of gay 'marriage' in New York. Dowd takes issue with a recently released report commissioned by the United
States Catholic bishops that sought to examine the "causes and
context" of the Catholic Church abuse scandals from past decades.
Dowd belittles the report and writes, "It concluded, absurdly,
that neither the all-male celibate priesthood nor homosexuality were
causes."
Whoa! Her
opinion seems pretty clear: Homosexuality was a direct cause of the sex abuse
of minors in the Catholic Church.
Indeed,
the heralded 2004 John Jay report, which thoroughly examined Church abuse
data from 1950 to 2002, reported that over 80 percent of abuse
victims were male, and the vast majority were teenagers. (In society as a
whole, most abuse victims are female.)
Most
clear-headed observers reached the obvious conclusion that the scandals largely
entailed criminal homosexual priests preying upon innocent adolescent boys.
However, you would be hard-pressed to hear that conclusion in the politically
correct "liberal" or "progressive" circles in which Dowd
resides. (Even the authors of the study went out of their way to publicly state
that homosexuality was not a cause, even though their own
data suggested otherwise.)
Will Dowd
be criticized for "demeaning" and/or "stereotyping" gays?
Will there be a demand that Dowd retract her claim?
----
No comments:
Post a Comment