Monday, October 21, 2013

The field hospital is open: reflections on Pope Francis’ interview


By Father Robert Barron 

As by now everyone in the world knows, Pope Francis offered a lengthy and wide-ranging interview to the editor of Civilta Cattolica, which was subsequently published in sixteen Jesuit-sponsored journals from a variety of countries. As we’ve come to expect practically anytime that this Pope speaks, the interview has provoked a media frenzy. To judge by the headlines in The New York Times and on CNN, the Catholic Church is in the midst of a moral and doctrinal revolution, led by a maverick Pope bent on dragging the old institution into the modern world. I might recommend that everyone take a deep breath and prayerfully (or at least thoughtfully) read what Pope Francis actually said. For what he actually said is beautiful, lyrical, spirit-filled, and in its own distinctive way, revolutionary.
The first question to which the Pope responded in this interview as simple: “Who is Jorge Mario Bergoglio (his given name)?” After a substantial pause, he said, “a sinner whom the Lord has looked upon.” At the heart of the matter, at the core of the “Catholic thing,” is this encounter between us sinners and the God of amazing grace. Long before we get to social teaching, to debates about birth control and abortion, to adjudicating questions about homosexual activity, to disputes about liturgy, etc., we have the graced moment when sinners are accepted, even though they are unacceptable. Pope Francis aptly illustrated his observation by drawing attention to Caravaggio’s masterpiece, “The Conversion of St. Matthew,” which depicts the instant when Matthew, a thoroughly self-absorbed and materialistic man, found himself looked upon by Christ’s merciful gaze. Because of that look, Matthew utterly changed, becoming first a disciple, then a missionary, and finally a martyr.
I believe that this first answer given by Pope Francis provides the interpretive lens for reading the rest of the interview. He is confessing to be a sinner who has found grace and conversion and who has thereby been transformed into a missionary. On the basis of that master insight, he is able to survey both Church and society with astonishing clarity and serenity. One of the most commented upon remarks in the interview is the following: “This church with which we should be thinking is the home of all, not a small chapel that can hold only a small group of selected people.” What the Pope is signaling here is that the Church, as his predecessor Paul VI put it, doesn’t have a mission; it is a mission, for its purpose is to cause the merciful face of Jesus to gaze upon everyone in the world. It is not an exclusive club where only the morally perfect are welcome, but rather, a home for sinners, which means a home for everybody.
And this insight provides the right context for understanding another controversial remark from the interview: “The Church sometimes has locked itself up in small things, in small-minded rules. The most important thing is the first proclamation:  Jesus Christ has saved you.”  The Pope is not suggesting that rules — moral, spiritual, liturgical, etc. — are unnecessary or unimportant, but he is indeed suggesting that they are secondary to the central reality of encountering the living Christ. If the Church leads with moral regulation, it will appear, especially to our postmodern culture, as fussy, puritanical, censorious. And it will most likely awaken a defensive reaction on the part of those it wishes to reach. It ought to lead with its always-appealing central message, namely the saving cross of Jesus, and only then should it speak of the moral and spiritual disciplines that will bring people into greater conformity with Christ. If I might proffer a perhaps trite analogy: when attempting to attract a young kid to the game of baseball, you don’t begin with the rulebook; rather, you begin with the beauty and majesty and rhythm of the game — and then you trust that he will come in time to understand the nature and purpose of the rules from the inside.
One of Pope Francis’s gifts as a communicator is a peculiar feel for the memorable image: “Shepherds should smell like their sheep;” and seminarians and priests ought to be willing to “make a mess” come readily to mind. The most striking analogy in the interview is this: “I see the church as a field hospital after battle.” No doctor doing triage on a battlefield is going to be fussing about his patients’ cholesterol or blood sugar levels. He is going to be treating major wounds and trying desperately to stop the bleeding.
What we find today, the Pope is implying, are millions of people who are, in the spiritual sense, gravely wounded. They are alienated from God, stuck in the no-man’s land of moral relativism, adrift with no sense of direction, and tempted by every form of errant desire. They require, therefore, not the fine points of moral doctrine, but basic healing. Perhaps this explains why the Church’s altogether valid teachings on ethics are so often met with incomprehension or hostility: far more elemental instruction is required.
I will confess to sharing some of the misgivings of commentators who have lamented that the Pope’s criticism of excessive legalism gave comfort to the wrong people. NARAL (National Abortion Rights Action League) published an ad, which simply said, “Pope Francis, Thank You. Signed, Pro-Choice Women Everywhere,” and Planned Parenthood expressed its approval of the Pope’s call to Catholics not to “obsess” over the issue of abortion. I certainly understand that those who have stood on the front lines of the pro-life battles for years feel that the Pope has unfairly characterized them as fanatics.

In the end, I feel that this relatively casual interview, precisely because it is not a formal encyclical, will provide a route of access to the Church for many people who might otherwise not have bothered to pay attention. It might in fact appeal to many of the walking wounded today who are in desperate need of mercy and healing.

Sunday, October 20, 2013

Accept Being Forgiven: Very Difficult.



Consider the conscience of Judas, and then, in contrast, the consciences of Mary Magdalene, Zacchaeus,The Good Thief, The Good Samaritan, The Publican Beside the Pharisee, The Woman Caught in Adultery… All were sinners and were bad, but Judas would not accept being loved and forgiven, and becoming good because of the love of Christ. Judas hated himself – like the others – but would not accept the tenderness of Christ’s mercy. See Francis! And then Augustine!

"This may sound like heresy, but it is the greatest truth! It is more difficult to let God love us, than to love Him! The best way to love Him in return is to open our hearts and let Him love us. Let Him draw close to us and feel Him close to us. This is really very difficult: letting ourselves be loved by Him. And that is perhaps what we need to ask today in the Mass: 'Lord, I want to love You, but teach me the difficult science, the difficult habit of let ting myself be loved by You, to feel You close and feel Your tenderness ! May the Lord give us this grace. " (Pope Francis – see below)


St. Augustine:     Letter to Proba: 29th Sunday


Why in our fear of not praying as we should, do we turn to so many things, to find what we should pray for? Why do we not say instead, in the words of the psalm: I have asked one thing from the Lord, this is what I will seek: to dwell in the Lord’s house all the days of my life, to see the graciousness of the Lord, and to visit his temple? There, the days do not come and go in succession, and the beginning of one day does not mean the end of another; all days are one, simultaneously and without end, and the life lived out in these days has itself no end.
  So that we might obtain this life of happiness, he who is true life itself taught us to pray, not in many words as though speaking longer could gain us a hearing. After all, we pray to one who, as the Lord himself tells us, knows what we need before we ask for it.

  Why he should ask us to pray, when he knows what we need before we ask him, may perplex us if we do not realise that our Lord and God does not want to know what we want (for he cannot fail to know it), but wants us rather to exercise our desire through our prayers, so that we may be able to receive what he is preparing to give us. His gift is very great indeed, but our capacity is too small and limited to receive it. That is why we are told:Enlarge your desires, do not bear the yoke with unbelievers.
  The deeper our faith, the stronger our hope, the greater our desire, the larger will be our capacity to receive that gift, which is very great indeed. No eye has seen it; it has no colour.No ear has heard it; it has no sound. It has not entered man’s heart; man’s heart must enter into it.

  In this faith, hope and love we pray always with unwearied desire. However, at set times and seasons we also pray to God in words, so that by these signs we may instruct ourselves and mark the progress we have made in our desire, and spur ourselves on to deepen it. The more fervent the desire, the more worthy will be its fruit. When the Apostle tells us: Pray without ceasing, he means this: Desire unceasingly that life of happiness which is nothing if not eternal, and ask it of him who alone is able to give it.

Pope Francis

The science of tenderness


http://media01.radiovaticana.va/imm/1_0_699286.JPG(Vatican Radio) It’s harder to open our hearts and let God love us than to love God in return. But the only way to really love Him is to love others, especially the poor. God is an expert in the science of tenderness and we should allow ourselves to be loved by Him. This was Pope Francis’ message at morning Mass Friday on the Solemnity of the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus. Emer McCarthy reports:http://en.radiovaticana.va/global_images/mp3_icon.gif 

Pope Francis referred to the solemnity as “the feast of love” of a “heart that loved so much” and repeated several times during his homily that Jesus loved us not with His words but with His deeds and his life. A love which, St. Ignatius said, "manifests itself more in deeds than in words" and that is especially "more giving than receiving." Pope Francis said "these two criteria are like the pillars of true love" and the Good Shepherd above all else represents the love of God. He knows His sheep by name, "because His is not an abstract or general love: it is love towards everyone ".
"A God who draws near out of love, walks with His people, and this walk comes to an unimaginable point. We could never have imagined that the same Lord would become one of us and walk with us, be present with us, present in His Church, present in the Eucharist, present in His Word, present in the poor, He is present, walking with us. And this is closeness: the shepherd close to his flock, close to his sheep, whom he knows, one by one. "

Reflecting on a passage from the Book of the Prophet Ezekiel, the Pope highlighted another aspect of God's love: caring for the lost, the wounded and the sick sheep:

"Tenderness! But the Lord loves us tenderly. The Lord knows that beautiful science of caresses, the tenderness of God. He does not love us with words. He comes close - closeness - and gives us His love with tenderness. Closeness and tenderness! The Lord loves us in these two ways, He draws near and gives all His love even in the smallest things: with tenderness. And this is a powerful love, because closeness and tenderness reveal the strength of God’s love”.

"But do you love each other as I have loved you?" Pope Francis asked this question of those present, emphasizing how love is "being close to others”, is "like that of the Good Samaritan" and in particular , in the sign of "closeness and tenderness". He also asked: How can we return all this love to the Lord? By "loving", by being "closer to Him," by being "tender with Him”, but this alone, he said, “is not enough”:


"This may sound like heresy, but it is the greatest truth! It is more difficult to let God love us, than to love Him! The best way to love Him in return is to open our hearts and let Him love us. Let Him draw close to us and feel Him close to us. This is really very difficult: letting ourselves be loved by Him. And that is perhaps what we need to ask today in the Mass: 'Lord, I want to love You, but teach me the difficult science, the difficult habit of let ting myself be loved by You, to feel You close and feel Your tenderness ! May the Lord give us this grace. "


Thursday, October 17, 2013

Larry Flynt: Don't Execute the Man Who Paralyzed Me

As the person who sent this to me commented: “It isn't quite forgiveness, isn't quite mercy, but somewhere in that pornographer, a spirit of something (I might say something Holy) seems to be at work.

6:00 AM PDT 10/17/2013 by Larry Flynt

Joseph Paul Franklin, who has confessed to shooting Flynt in 1978 and been convicted in a series of racially motivated murders, is set for execution in Missouri in November. Flynt writes for THR, "I have every reason to be overjoyed with that decision, but I am anything but."

On March 6, 1978, as I stood on the steps of the Georgia courthouse where I was fighting obscenity charges, a series of gunshots rang out. I remember nothing that happened after that until I woke up in the intensive care unit. The damage to my central nervous system was severe, and it took several weeks before doctors could stabilize me. From then on, I was paralyzed from the waist down, and have been confined to a wheelchair ever since.

Years later, a white supremacist named Joseph Paul Franklin was arrested for shooting and killing an interracial couple. He soon began confessing to other crimes, and that’s when he admitted to having shot me. He said he'd targeted me because of a photo spread I ran in Hustler magazine featuring a black man and a white woman. He had bombed several synagogues. He had shot Vernon Jordan Jr., the civil rights activist. He hated blacks, he hated Jews, he hated all minorities. He went around the country committing all these crimes. I think somebody had to have been financing him, but nothing ever turned up on who that somebody may have been.
In all the years since the shooting, I have never come face-to-face with Franklin. I would love an hour in a room with him and a pair of wire-cutters and pliers, so I could inflict the same damage on him that he inflicted on me. But, I do not want to kill him, nor do I want to see him die.

Supporters of capital punishment argue that it is a deterrent which prevents potential murderers from committing future crimes, but research has failed to provide a shred of valid scientific proof to that effect whatsoever. In 18th century England, pickpocketing was a capital offense. Once a week, crowds would gather in a public square to observe public hangings of convicted pickpockets, unaware that their own pockets were being emptied by thieves moving among them. That’s a true story, and, if you’re ever trying to convince somebody of why the death penalty is not a deterrent, that’s a good example.

As far as the severity of punishment is concerned, to me, a life spent in a 3-by-6-foot cell is far harsher than the quick release of a lethal injection. And costs to the taxpayer? Execution has been proven to be far more expensive for the state than a conviction of life without parole, due to the long and complex judicial process required for capital cases.

Franklin has been sentenced by the Missouri Supreme Court to death by legal injection on Nov. 20. I have every reason to be overjoyed with this decision, but I am not. I have had many years in this wheelchair to think about this very topic. As I see it, the sole motivating factor behind the death penalty is vengeance, not justice, and I firmly believe that a government that forbids killing among its citizens should not be in the business of killing people itself.


Pope Warns of the Dangers of Ideological Thought in Christianity

Blogger's note: Ideology is a verbal/conceptual presentation of reality reduced to an object. "It" is the content of ideology. 

Faith is the consciousness of being a subject going out of self to receive Another Self. It becomes conceptual and verbal by reflection on the consciousness. "I Am" (Jn. 8, 24, 28, 58), the divine Person of the Son, is the content of faith.

Pope Francis: 'Becoming A Disciple of Ideology Closes the Door to Faith'



Vatican City, October 17, 2013 (Zenit.orgJunno Arocho Esteves | 696 hits
During his homily at Mass in the chapel of Casa Santa Marta, Pope Francis warned of the danger of “becoming a disciple of ideology” which he said can lead one to lose their faith. The Holy Father based his homily on today’s Gospel which recounts Christ’s warning to the scholars of the law.

“When we go down the path and find in front of us a closed Church, we feel strange because a closed Church is not understood,” the Pope said. “The Lord who is inside cannot come out.” This image of the closed Church, he explained, is given by Jesus in today’s Gospel. The Holy Father also explained why many Christians fall into this “attitude of ‘key in pocket’ and closed door.”

“Faith passes, so to speak, through an alembic (distillery) and becomes an ideology. And ideology does not convene. In ideology there is no Jesus: his tenderness, love, meekness. And ideologies are always rigid,” the Pope said.

“In every sense: rigid. And when a Christian becomes a disciple of ideology, they have lost the faith: they are no more a disciple of Jesus, they are a disciple of this attitude of thought, of this…” And for this reason Jesus says to them: ‘You have taken away the key of knowledge’. The knowledge of Jesus is transformed into an ideological and also moralistic knowledge, because these closed the door with so many requirements.”

The Holy Father continued his homily saying that ideology within the Church only serves to alienate people. “These Christian ideologies are a grave sickness!” he exclaimed. However, he noted, this sickness is not something that is relatively new, but spoken of by the apostles, particularly St. John, during the time of the early Church.

“Christians who lose the faith and prefer ideology become rigid, moralists, ethicists, but without goodness. But this may be the question, no? Why does a Christian become that way? What happens in the heart of that Christian, that priest, of that bishop, of that Pope, that makes them that way. It is simply one thing: that Christian does not pray. And if there is no prayer, you will always close the door.”

Emphasizing the importance of prayer in Christian life, the 76 year old pontiff, saying that without it, a Christian witness becomes a witness full of pride. Ideological Christians, he said, become proud, sure of themselves and lacking humility. The Holy Father however made the distinction of true prayer and the mere recitation of prayers, a distinction made by Christ who rebuked the doctors of the law who prayed so as to be seen. “It is one thing to pray and another to recite prayers,” the Pope said.

Concluding his homily, Pope Francis called on the faithful to ask the Lord for several graces in avoiding this ideological path. “First, to not cease to pray, to not lose faith, to remain humble. So that we will not become closed, which closes the path to the Lord.”


Tuesday, October 15, 2013

To Understand the Mysteries of Today - The Humanity of Christ


St. Teresa of Avila

The Humanity of Christ

“To reveal to us great and hidden mysteries”

If Christ Jesus dwells in a man as his friend and noble leader, that man can endure all things, for Christ helps and strengthens us and never abandons us. He is a true friend. And I clearly see that if we expect to please him and receive an abundance of his graces, God desires that these graces must come to us from the hands of Christ, through his most sacred humanity, in which God takes delight.

Many, many times I have perceived this through experience. The Lord has told it to me. I have definitely seen that we must enter by this gate if we wish his Sovereign Majesty to reveal to us great and hidden mysteries. A person should desire no other path, even if he is at the summit of contemplation; on this road he walks safely. All blessings come to us through our Lord. He will teach us, for in beholding his life we find that he is the best example.

What more do we desire from such a good friend at our side? Unlike our friends in the world, he will never abandon us when we are troubled or distressed. Blessed is the one who truly loves him and always keeps him near. Let us consider the glorious Saint Paul: it seems that no other name fell from his lips than that of Jesus, because the name of Jesus was fixed and embedded in his heart. Once I had come to understand this truth, I carefully considered the lives of some of the saints, the great contemplatives, and found that they took no other path: Francis, Anthony of Padua, Bernard, Catherine of Siena. A person must walk along this path in freedom, placing himself in God’s hands. If God should desire to raise us to the position of one who is an intimate and shares his secrets, we ought to accept this gladly.

Whenever we think of Christ we should recall the love that led him to bestow on us so many graces and favours, and also the great love God showed in giving us in Christ a pledge of his love; for love calls for love in return. Let us strive to keep this always before our eyes and to rouse ourselves to love him. For if at some time the Lord should grant us the grace of impressing his love on our hearts, all will become easy for us and we shall accomplish great things quickly and without effort. [
From a work by Saint Teresa of Avila, virgin (Opusc. De libro vitae, cap 22,6-7.14)]

 Someone sent me an article in the NYT (September 22, 2012 A21) "A Doctor's Ministry, Bridging Science and Spirit" - which is extraordinary. Journalist Samuel G. Freedman quotes Dr. Joseph Du;tkowsky: 

"Some people stand next to the ocean to feel the presence of God. I get to see the likeness of God every day. I see children with some amazing deformities. But God doesn't make mistakes. So they are the image." He goes on: "For years, when asked why I chose this profession, I had no good answer until I came upon the first chapter of the Gospel of John. Jesus and his disciples come upon a man who was blind from birth. The disciples asked Jesus, 'Did this man or his parents sin that he was born blind?' Jesus answered that the blindness was not the result of the man or his parents' sin.  The man was born blind 'so the glory of God might be revealed.' Every day in my work I find myself in the revealed glory of God.'" 

Monday, October 14, 2013

Pope's Address to the Plenary Assembly of the Pontifical Council for Promoting the New Evangelization


VATICAN CITY, October 14, 2013 (Zenit.org) - At 12 o’clock this morning, the Holy Father Francis received in audience -- in the Clementine Hall of the Apostolic Vatican Palace --, the participants in the Plenary Assembly of the Pontifical Council for Promoting the New Evangelization.
Here is a translation of the Pope’s address to those present.
* * *
THE HOLY FATHER’S ADDRESS
Dear Brothers and Sisters,

I greet you all and thank you for what you do at the service of the New Evangelization, and for the work for the Year of Faith. My heartfelt thanks! What I would like to say to you today can be summarized in three points: primacy of witness; urgency of going out to encounter; pastoral program centered on the essential.

In our time we often witness an attitude of indifference to faith, regarded as no longer relevant in man’s life. New Evangelization means to reawaken the life of faith in the heart and mind of our contemporaries. Faith is a gift of God, but it is important that we Christians show that we live the faith in a concrete way, through love, concord, joy, suffering, because this elicits questions, as at the beginning of the journey of the Church: Why do they live like this? What drives them? These are questions that go to the heart of evangelization, which is the witness of t faith and charity. What we need especially in these times are credible witnesses who with their life and also with the word render the Gospel visible, reawaken attraction for Jesus Christ, for God’s beauty.

So many people have fallen away from the Church. It’s a mistake to put the blame on one side or the other, in fact, it’s not about talking about fault. There are responsibilities in the history of the Church and of her men, in certain ideologies and also in individual persons. As children of the Church we must continue on the path of Vatican Council II, stripping ourselves of useless and harmful things, of false worldly securities which weigh down the Church and damage her true face.

There is need of Christians who render the mercy of God visible to the men of today, His tenderness for every creature. We all know that the crisis of contemporary humanity is not superficial but profound. Because of this the New Evangelization -- while calling to have the courage to go against the current, to be converted from idols to the only true God --, cannot but use the language of mercy, made up of gestures and attitudes even before words. In the midst of today’s humanity the Church says: Come to Jesus, all you who labor and are heavy laden and you will find rest for your souls (cf. Matthew 11:28-30). Come to Jesus. He alone has the words of eternal life.

Every baptized person is a “cristoforo,” a bearer of Christ, as the ancient holy Fathers said. Whoever has encountered Christ, as the Samaritan woman at the well, cannot keep this experience to him/herself, but has the desire to share it, to bring Jesus to others (cf. John 4). It is for all of us to ask ourselves if one who meets us perceives in our life the warmth of faith, sees in our face the joy of having encountered Christ!

Here we move to the second aspect: the encounter, to go out to encounter others. The New Evangelization is a renewed movement towards him who has lost the faith and the profound meaning of life. This dynamism is part of the great mission of Christ to bring life to the world, the Father’s love to humanity. The Son of God “went out” of his divine condition and came to encounter us. The Church is within this movement; every Christian is called to go out to encounter others, to dialogue with those who do not think the way we do, with those who have another faith, or who don’t have faith. To encounter all because we all have in common our having been created in the image and likeness of God. We can go out  to encounter everyone, without fear and without giving up our membership.

No one is excluded from the hope of life, from the love of God. The Church is sent to reawaken this hope everywhere, especially where it is suffocated by difficult existential conditions, at times inhuman, where hope does not breathe but is suffocated. There is need of the oxygen of the Gospel, of the breath of the Spirit of the Risen Christ, to rekindle it in hearts. The Church is the house whose doors are always open not only so that everyone can find welcome and breathe love and hope, but also because we can go out and bring this love and this hope. The Holy Spirit drives us to go out of our enclosure and guides us to the fringes of humanity.

In the Church all this, however, is not left to chance or improvisation. It calls for a common commitment to a pastoral plan that recalls the essential and that is “well centered on the essential, namely on Jesus Christ. It is no use to be scattered in so many secondary or superfluous things, but to be concentrated on the fundamental reality, which is the encounter with Christ, with his mercy, with his love, and to love brothers as He loved us. A project animated by the creativity and imagination of the Holy Spirit, who drives us also to follow new ways, with courage and without becoming fossilized! We could ask ourselves: how effective is the pastoral of our dioceses and parishes? Does it render the essential visible? Do the different experiences, characteristics, walk together in the harmony that the Spirit gives? Or is our pastoral scattered, fragmentary where, in the end, each one goes his own way?

In this context I would like to stress the importance of catechesis, as an instance of evangelization. Pope Paul VI already did so in the encyclical Evangelii nuntiandi (cf. n. 44). From there the great catechetical movement has carried forward a renewal to surmount the break between the Gospel and the culture and illiteracy of our days in the matter of faith. I have recalled several times a fact that has struck me in my ministry: to meet children who cannot even do the Sign of the Cross! Precious is the service carried out by the catechists for the New Evangelization, and it is important that parents be the first catechists, the first educators of the faith in their own family with their witness and with the word.

Thank you, dear friends, for this visit. Good work! May the Lord bless you and Our Lady protect you.

Pontiff Warns of Dangers of 'Jonah Syndrome'

Pope Francis Calls for Avoiding a 'Dyed' Sanctity

By Junno Arocho Esteves
VATICAN CITY, October 14, 2013 (Zenit.org) -

 Pope Francis warned against the hypocrisy of thinking one is saved by pious works during his homily at morning Mass today at Casa Santa Marta. This attitude of "perfect piety" risks for one to look for their own salvation but not for the care of the poor. The Holy Father referred to this hypocrisy as the “Jonah syndrome”, referring to the sign of Jonah that Christ speaks of in today’s Gospel.

The Gospel of Luke, which recounted Christ’s warning to the “wicked generation”, a term he said that is very strong. “This, however, does not refer to the people who followed Him with so much love,” the Pope explained, “but to the doctors of the law who tried to test Him and make Him fall in their trap.”
Saying that while Christ says that the only sign that will be given to them will be the sign of Jonah, Pope Francis said that there also exists the “Jonah syndrome”, meaning, the tendency to justify oneself with doctrine while sinners fend for themselves. The Holy Father referenced Jonah’s initial reaction to preaching in Nineveh, which was to flee.

“The ‘Jonah syndrome’ does not have the zeal for the conversion of people, it is in search of a sanctity - if you permit me to say - a ‘dyed’ sanctity, all beautiful, all well made, but lacking that zeal to go and preach the Lord,” the Holy Father said.

“However in front of this generation that is sick from the “Jonah syndrome”, the Lord promises the sign of Jonah. The other version, that of Matthew, says: Jonah was inside the whale for three nights and three days, referring to Jesus in the tomb - his death and Resurrection - and that is the sign that Jesus promises, against hypocrisy, against this attitude of perfect religiosity, against this attitude of a group of Pharisees.”

The Holy Father noted another Gospel as an example of these two attitudes which is found in the parable of the Pharisee and the publican. The story, which speaks of a Pharisee who praises God for not being like the publican (tax collector) who instead prays for God’s mercy.

“This is the sign that Jesus promises for his forgiveness through his death and Resurrection: it his mercy, ‘It is mercy that I want and not sacrifice’,” the Pope said. This true ‘sign of Jonah’, he went on to say, is the complete trust in one’s salvation through the blood of Christ. While there are many Christians believe they are saved only through their works, it is not what brings salvation. Good works, he said, “are a consequence, a response to that merciful love that saves us.”

Concluding his homily, Pope Francis told the faithful present that the sign of Jonah is a calling for all Christians to follow the Lord with humility and meekness despite our sins. “It is a calling, as well as a choice,” he said.

In Defense of Pope Francis


October 14, 2013

William Doino Jr.

In 2005, following the death of Blessed John Paul II, I asked one of my closest friends—a Jesuit who has served the Church loyally for decades—who he thought would make a worthy successor. Stressing he would welcome anyone chosen, he remarked, “I hope it might be my Jesuit colleague in Argentina, Cardinal Bergoglio. Many of us believe he has the qualities of a saint.”

http://www.firstthings.com/featured-author/william-doino-jrThe election, as it turned out, went to Joseph Ratzinger, who left behind his own extraordinary legacy as Benedict XVI. But Cardinal Bergolio’s name stayed with me, and when he succeeded Benedict, I heard again from my Jesuit friend. He was overwhelmed with joy. “Like Benedict, he will prove a treasure to the Church. He is a man of great faith and compassion, truly humble, and completely devoted to Our Lord. Let us pray for him.”

Shortly after he was elected pontiff, my friend, Robert Moynihan wrote a beautiful book about Bergoglio’s Christian witness, Pray for Me. And what that book conveys, as I said at the time, is even more true today:

If there is one thing that distinguishes Pope Francis from other world leaders, it is his authenticity. He is not a man to be led around by bureaucrats or dubious “advisors,” much less “spinmeisters,” but instead follows his own heart. Much like his namesake, St. Francis, he is a bit of a free spirit, but it is a freedom anchored deep within the Church, and completely orthodox. Francis is innovative, independent-minded and a would-be reformer—but certainly no rebel.

Like many men of God, however, Francis has met opposition, even detraction. When John Paul II died, and Bergoglio’s name surfaced as a possible successor, his anti-Catholic opponents in Argentina spread the myth that he had collaborated with the military junta during the 1970’s as Jesuit provincial, allowing two Jesuit priests to be kidnapped and tortured. When Bergoglio actually became pope, after Benedict’s resignation, the canard returned with a vengeance. The allegations were widely repeated, but the Holy See denounced the campaign as coming from “anti-clerical, left-wing elements” used to attacking the Church. Francis was vindicated when one of two priests (the other has since died), who had supposedly been sold out, publicly defended Francis, saying that charges that he and his fellow Jesuit were betrayed by their superior are “baseless.” Moreover, a new investigative work has just appeared revealing that, far from collaborating with the military dictatorship, the future pope actually saved many of its intended victims, just as Oskar Schindler rescued Jews from the Nazis.

One would think, given this effort to defame the pontiff, that commentators would be extra-careful not to misrepresent him. Instead, however, what we have witnessed, from astrange alliance of commentators, on both the Left and Right, is an effort to depict Francis as someone he is not, and never has been.

On everything from evangelization to conscience to morality to liturgy, the Pope’s words have been interpreted in ways that make his orthodoxy almost unrecognizable.

Begin with the Pope’s recent interview with La Repubblica. Put aside that the interview was not recorded, was an after-the-fact reconstruction, and is certainly not magisterial,as the Vatican itself noted. For reaching out to a friendly atheist, Eugenio Scalfari, whom Francis encouraged to “follow the good” as he conceived it, and for assuring him that proselytism is “solemn nonsense,” the pope suddenly stood accused of sacrificing the Gospel to political correctness, falling into relativism and excusing misguided consciences.

Far from sanctioning relativism or justifying consciences darkened by sin, the Pope was simply affirming the Catholic conviction that “the natural law will assert itself,” as Brett Salkeld noted, in an insightful post at Vox Nova. “Even in times of grave depravity, when the whole culture conspires to cover up a systematic sin . . . the natural law can reveal itself through the consciences of those who honestly seek to know the truth.”

And like the apostles, Francis has consistently exhorted the faithful to preach the Gospel everywhere, and without compromise. He did so just this past May, in hisMessage for World Mission Day, which we will be celebrating this Sunday (October 20th). “It is necessary,” taught the Pope, “to proclaim courageously and in every situation the Gospel of Christ,” and to “take it to the ‘peripheries,’ especially to those who have not yet had the opportunity to know Christ.”

Francis also explained the difference between proposing the Gospel, and imposing it through coercive “proselytism”:

Sometimes, it is still thought that proclaiming the truth of the Gospel means an assault on freedom. Paul VI speaks eloquently on this: “It would be . . . an error to impose something on the consciences of our brethren. But to propose to their consciences the truth of the Gospel and salvation in Jesus Christ, with complete clarity and with total respect for free options which it presents . . . is a tribute to this freedom.” . . . The Church’s missionary spirit is not about proselytizing, but the testimony of a life that illuminates the path, which brings hope and love.

This is exactly the approach Francis was following in his conversation with Scalfari—not just for his benefit, but for everyone. And it is ironic, just as certain Christians were chastising Francis for allegedly watering down the Gospel, Time magazine, a very secular resource, understood what was going on:

He [Francis] may be the one being interviewed, but he is also the one guiding the conversation, especially when it comes to the core questions of belief. He proves himself to be a Socratic teacher. Scalfari asks a question, the Holy Father returns it with a question or a thought which inspires a question, Scalfari figures his way through it. The result has a profound spiritual effect, and pushes the reader to consider what it means to believe.

If the Pope’s approach toward nonbelievers was widely misunderstood, his statements on social issues have been distorted beyond recognition. As the Archbishop of Buenos Aires, Cardinal Bergolio courageously and very publicly defended the Church’s teachings on marriage and sexual morality, a stance for which he was bitterly attacked. But on his plane trip back from Brazil, five innocent words uttered by Francis—“Who am I to judge?”—became a rallying cry for those looking for permission to sin, and mistakenly thought Francis had given it to them. All Francis had done, in connection with a discussion on sexual sin and confession, was urge Christians to welcome sincere penitents back with mercy—a perennial teaching of the Church.

In 2005, Cardinal Bergolio gave an extraordinary pro-life sermon, exhorting the faithful to fight abortion and the culture of death, and not relent in the face of persecution, even if “they deliver you to the courts.” Two years later, he described abortion as a ruthless “death penalty” and approved a document which instructed that Holy Communion be denied those facilitating abortions, including politicians. As Pope, he has personallyjoined Italy’s March for Life, implored legislators to defend the unborn, and stated every unborn child killed through abortion has the face of Jesus Christ. Yet because he has also said that Catholic opposition to abortion—and the Church’s other moral doctrines—need to be seen as flowing from the centrality of the Gospel, and not in isolation from it, a multitude of pundits declared he was somehow rebuking the American bishops. But the American bishops are doing no more than what Cardinal Bergolio did as an episcopal leader in Argentina himself, and in a recent meeting with Cardinal Dolan, Pope Francis affirmed the American bishops’ public stands.

Even as the pope’s comments about not obsessing about moral issues apart from the Gospel are highlighted, he himself continues to be assailed because he “won’t stop talking about the devil.”

Many have written that Francis’ pontificate has a different tone and accent from Benedict’s, and that their attitudes toward the liturgy are clearly distinguishable. But whatever the degree of their stylistic differences, and extent they favor the Latin Mass, both accept its legitimacy, and its attraction to numerous believers. The same cannot be said of those who unequivocally condemn it, or, conversely, try to use it as a weapon against Vatican II.

Most astonishing of all is the idea that Francis is accommodating his papacy to the ways of the world, ignoring the Gospel’s command not to conform to it. Sandro Magisterwrote about Francis’s mission: “There is nothing in this program of the pontificate that could turn out to be unacceptable to the dominant secular opinion.” Yet, the day after he was elected pope, Francis declared:

When we journey without the cross, when we build without the cross, and when we confess a Christ without the cross, we are not disciples of the Lord: we are worldly . . . I would like for us all, after these days of grace, to have courage, precisely the courage, to walk in the presence of the Lord’s presence . . . to build the Church upon the blood of the Lord, which is poured out on the cross; and to confess the only glory there is: Christ crucified.

And the day after Magister published his piece, Francis continued at Assisi: “A Christian cannot coexist with the spirit of the world, ” for worldliness “leads us to vanity arrogance and pride,” it “is an idol,” and “worldliness is a murderer because it kills souls, kills people, kills the Church.”
This is the spirit of cultural appeasement?
In recent days, more and more people have taken aim at Francis, saying they feel compelled to do so, to uphold the honor of the Church. It is time for those of us who admire Francis, and believe in his integrity, to vigorously defend him.


Friday, October 11, 2013

Father John Wauck discusses the Holy Father’s ‘relentlessly personal’ approach.



BY JOAN FRAWLEY DESMOND

Opus Dei Father John Wauck teaches in the School of Church Communications at
the Pontifical University of the Holy Cross in Rome. During the 2013 papal
conclave, he served as a television commentator for ABC.

 On Oct. 8, he spoke with the Register's senior editor, Joan Frawley
Desmond, about Pope Francis’ efforts to reach alienated Catholics and the
public through an unprecedented strategy of informal interviews that
reportedly bypassed Vatican filters.

 

 Two recent interviews with Pope Francis have produced inaccurate headlines
attacking pro-life activism and Catholic conversions. New York Times
columnist Ross Douthat worried that the Pope’s communications strategy —
which Douthat described as an “almost-frantic engagement with the
lapsed-Catholic, post-Catholic and non-Catholic world” — could backfire.
What’s your view?

 It’s important for everybody to calm down and look at the big picture.

 Pope Francis, the Successor of Peter, is the most popular man on the
planet. There are worse things that could happen, especially given the water
under the bridge, such as the abuse scandals.

 You can quibble about how he is saying things, but we are in a good place.
Even the need to explain and interpret the Pope’s words is not bad,
because you get to talk about things.

 I lived through the whole Da Vinci Code excitement, and in the end, it was
a gift. It made Opus Dei open the door and shine the light, and people found
Opus Dei was okay. It wouldn’t have happened without the novel.

 

 In the Pope’s latest interview with Eugenio Scalfari, of the Italian
newspaper La Repubblica, the Register reported that the interviewer
“admitted to neither recording nor even taking notes of the exchange.”
The journalist said he “did show the text to the Holy Father for approval,
but it isn’t clear how closely the Pope read it.” What do you know about
this interview?

 It isn’t clear Pope Francis had said any of the things the story reported
he had said.

 But this is a tiny thing in the big picture, which is that the Pope’s
words are being parsed in the news.

 No other pope got a CNN headline when he called for a bishops’ synod.
That is free publicity.

 Insiders can worry about how it was said, but he is not changing any
doctrines, and he is explicit about that.

 The Pope wants people to know that the Church isn’t here to condemn them.
That is one of the false images of the Church.

 Is it possible that he is being misunderstood by some of the public? Of
course. But he is trying to reshape how the Church is seen — and that will
then make it possible for many to hear the moral message.

 Keep in mind that when he talks to the Catholics at Mass at the Doma [St.
Martha guest house], he is not afraid to admonish the congregation in house.
But when he is talking to the world, to the old atheist, he talks in a
different way.

 

 Catholics aren’t used to a pope talking off the cuff in newspapers, and
the unpredictable outcome has made some very uneasy.

 It can be disconcerting. The interviews are not magisterial statements.

 He is talking to a soul. He is relentlessly personal, one-on-one, talking
all the time. Seeing it in those terms, it is easier to understand what he
is saying.

 Part of the enthusiastic response to Francis is the sense that you are
entering into a relationship with a father figure. People catch that sense
of spiritual paternity and think, “This could be my dad.”

 Benedict gave an impression of a teacher bent on communicating important
truths and was almost willfully stepping aside. He didn’t want to be in
the picture. Theologically that is correct, but, psychologically, the sheep
like a pastor. People are hungry for this kind of relationship.

 

 What is the feeling in Rome a half year after Pope Francis’ election?

 The general feeling of the Italian population is that they love him to
death. Shopkeepers, taxi drivers are huge fans.

 Those who are not are those deeply involved in the life of the Church and
are disconcerted. [They are questioning:] “What exactly is the agenda
here? Where are we going, and what am I supposed to be doing?”

 

 How would you describe Pope Francis’ communications strategy?

 I don’t think there is any strategy. The media strategy is: Get out of
the way — Francis is in town and doing his thing and winning over the
masses.

 

 Benedict was often criticized for communications problems during his
pontificate. What is the difference between his approach and Francis’
efforts?

 It is night and day. Benedict wasn’t terribly interested in mixing it up
with reporters. And people were not expecting [Cardinal Jorge] Bergoglio to
be either. He wasn’t out giving interviews in Argentina.

 Now, he is taking interviews, and I don’t think they are coming from
Father Lombardi [the papal spokesman]. He is running his own communications
shop.

 It is working so far. The question is when and if the honeymoon will end.

 

 So Pope Francis acknowledges the frustrations of lapsed Catholics, and that
creates fresh opportunities for outreach at the parish level or around the
family dinner table. Are we ready for this engagement?

 That is a long story about the lack of preparation of generations of
Catholics left without formation and priests poorly prepared to explain the
faith.

 

 Pope Benedict XVI predicted the faithful were being sidelined from
mainstream culture in the West, yet they could still serve as a “creative
minority,” a leaven in a secular world. Is Pope Francis concerned that the
faithful are too insular and have retreated from this kind of outreach?

 With Francis, there is a turn to the outside. Benedict was interested in
making sure that God was at the center of the Church, including the liturgy.

 Francis’ message is very valuable: The Catholic Church is not something
that was just made for Catholics. It is made for the whole world — and
specifically sinners. He wants that message seen, heard and understood.

 We all believe that. But we don’t always act or think that way. We slip
into a tribal mentality: It’s our thing. Or: The Church is for the good
people. Yes, of course you have to put your own house in order, and that is
what Benedict was doing.

 My hunch is that Francis believes that part of getting your house in order
is understanding correctly what the Church is about and for. That missionary
outlook is important.

 

 Janet Smith, the U.S. moral theologian and pro-life leader, wrote a column
in First Things that challenged the Pope’s suggestion that Catholics
should set aside hot-button issues like abortion to first help people learn
that God loves them and forgives their sins. Said Smith: “I think most
people think they are not sinners and not in need of redemption.” Has the
Pope unnecessarily alienated pro-lifers?

 There might be awkward moments. Pope Francis is directed to the outside.
That goes for his language as well.

 But his speeches include a lot of solid, clear teaching. Pro-lifers should
run with the good stuff, and that will clarify the ambiguous [remarks].

 What is interesting to consider is that Francis is asking the bishops named
by Blessed John Paul II and Benedict, and the priests and seminarians formed
by these popes, to get out into the fray: Don’t stay home.

 That could be really good. They will carry out into the street, the
periphery and the world their understanding of the faith and the priesthood
shaped by John Paul and Benedict.

 The [current] seminarians and many priests entered into the priesthood
after the sex-abuse scandals. That has made them stronger: They have had to
wrestle with corruption in the clergy and people looking askance. Telling
those guys to get out there is very positive.