Monday, December 21, 2015

The Great Message to Families (Repeat from previous post)


* * * * * * * * * * * 
There is something else I want to say to you, perhaps the most important thing: I encourage you to take care of your marriage and your children. To take care and not neglect them: to play with your children. Marriage is like a plant. It’s not like a closet, which one puts there in the room, and it’s enough to dust it every now and then. A plant is alive, it is taken care of every day: one sees how it’s doing, gives it water, and so on. Marriage is a living reality: a couple’s life is never taken for granted, in any phase of the course of the family. We remind ourselves that the most precious gift for the children is not things but the love of the parents. And I do not intend only the love of parents for the children, but in fact the love of parents between them,namely, the conjugal relation. This does you, and also your children, so much good! Don’t neglect the family!
Hence, first of all cultivate the “plant” of marriage, which you spouses are, and at the same time take care of the relation with your children, also here, focusing more on the human relation than on things. Speak to your children, listen to them, ask them what they think. This dialogue between parents and children does so much good! It makes the children grow in maturity. We focus on mercy, on daily relations, between husband and wife, between parents and children, between brothers and sisters, and we take care of the grandparents. Grandparents are so important in the family. Grandparents have memory; they have wisdom. Do not leave grandparents to one side! They are very important. A young lady was telling me that she has a seven-year-old son, and that the grandmother, in her nineties, lives with her, but that she is not altogether well, and she was advised to put her in a rest home. And this wise lady, who hasn’t studied at a university, answered the one who was advising her to put the grandmother in a home of rest: “No! I want my son to grow beside his grandmother!” She knew the good that grandparents do to grandchildren. Take care of peace in the family: we all know there is quarrelling in the family. When there is no quarrelling in a marriage, it seems abnormal. What is important is that the day not end without making peace.
The Jubilee is to be lived also in the domestic Church, not only in great events! What’s more, the Lord loves one who practices mercy in ordinary circumstances. I wish you this: that you experience the joy of mercy, beginning in your family. 
Thank you for your work, forgive the scandals and go forward. Go forward in this community and bring my greeting and good wishes to your dear ones, to the elderly and to the sick. And, please, continue to pray for me. Thank you

To Workers at Vatican: Thank you, Forgive Us For the Scandals, Love Your Families.

'And while I thank you, I also want to ask forgiveness for the scandals that have happened in the Vatican.'


Dear Brothers and Sisters, welcome!
Christmas, now close, offers us a beautiful occasion to meet with one another and to exchange greetings. 
First of all, I wish to thank you for your work, for the commitment you have to do things well always, even when there is no recognition. So often one does something well and it is not acknowledged. I would like to thank particularly those among you who for the many years have been doing the same type of work -- work that is often hidden; and who seek to do things as they should be done. We know that this is normal, it is simply to do one’s duty, but we also know that it’s not easy for us human beings; we are not machines – thank God! – and sometimes we are in need of an incentive, or of some change. I congratulate you who feel just pride in doing the normal everyday things to the best. Thank you! We go forward, in the different realms of work, collaborating together, with patience, seeking to help one another. 
And while I thank you, I also want to ask forgiveness for the scandals that have happened in the Vatican. However, I would like my attitude and yours, especially in these days, to be above all that of prayer, to pray for the persons involved in these scandals, so that the one who has done wrong repents and is able to rediscover the right way. 
There is something else I want to say to you, perhaps the most important thing: I encourage you to take care of your marriage and your children. To take care and not neglect them: to play with your children. Marriage is like a plant. It’s not like a closet, which one puts there in the room, and it’s enough to dust it every now and then. A plant is alive, it is taken care of every day: one sees how it’s doing, gives it water, and so on. Marriage is a living reality: a couple’s life is never taken for granted, in any phase of the course of the family. We remind ourselves that the most precious gift for the children is not things but the love of the parents. And I do not intend only the love of parents for the children, but in fact the love of parents between them,namely, the conjugal relation. This does you, and also your children, so much good! Don’t neglect the family!
Hence, first of all cultivate the “plant” of marriage, which you spouses are, and at the same time take care of the relation with your children, also here, focusing more on the human relation than on things. Speak to your children, listen to them, ask them what they think. This dialogue between parents and children does so much good! It makes the children grow in maturity. We focus on mercy, on daily relations, between husband and wife, between parents and children, between brothers and sisters, and we take care of the grandparents. Grandparents are so important in the family. Grandparents have memory; they have wisdom. Do not leave grandparents to one side! They are very important. A young lady was telling me that she has a seven-year-old son, and that the grandmother, in her nineties, lives with her, but that she is not altogether well, and she was advised to put her in a rest home. And this wise lady, who hasn’t studied at a university, answered the one who was advising her to put the grandmother in a home of rest: “No! I want my son to grow beside his grandmother!” She knew the good that grandparents do to grandchildren. Take care of peace in the family: we all know there is quarrelling in the family. When there is no quarrelling in a marriage, it seems abnormal. What is important is that the day not end without making peace.
The Jubilee is to be lived also in the domestic Church, not only in great events! What’s more, the Lord loves one who practices mercy in ordinary circumstances. I wish you this: that you experience the joy of mercy, beginning in your family. 
Thank you for your work, forgive the scandals and go forward. Go forward in this community and bring my greeting and good wishes to your dear ones, to the elderly and to the sick. And, please, continue to pray for me. Thank you again and happy Christmas!

Sunday, December 20, 2015

Jesus Christ, the New David, Fulfilling the Promise to Abraham - The Global Kingdom: The Communio

Robert Barron: 23d day of Advent.
The New David
Along with Moses and Abraham, David was the most important figure of the Old Testament. His kingship represented the fulfillment of so many of the expectations of Israel, and his reign became synonymous with peace and empire.

Moreover, David had received an extraordinary promise, which is recorded in the second book of Samuel. Through the prophet Nathan, God informed David that his line would last forever, that a son of his body would rule forever.

During the long years that followed the time of David, Israel remained haunted by this great king and by this even greater promise. Soon after David’s reign, his united empire fell apart, and the kings of both north and south proved to be pretty pathetic characters. Still the people, prompted by their prophets, hoped that the definitive king would emerge from David’s line.

This is precisely the hope articulated by one of the minor prophets, Micah, a seer who lived and wrote in the eighth century BC, some 250 years after David. Channelling the words of the Lord, Micah says, “You Bethlehem-Ephratha, too small to be among the clans of Judah, from you shall come forth for me one who is to ruler in Israel; whose origin is from old, from ancient times” (Micah 5:1).

Why Bethlehem? Because that was the city of Jesse, the city of David. It was, across Israelite history, a tiny place, an insignificant “suburb” of Jerusalem, but it was David’s city, and the promise was that a descendant of David would be the great ruler.

Under David, for a brief and shining moment, Israel was united, but soon after David’s death, the nation fell apart. The dream then was that the new David would bring the tribes back together. 

But then there was an even greater dream. Listen again to Micah: “For now his greatness shall reach to the ends of the earth; he shall be peace.” A united Israel would become a magnet to draw the rest of the world. When the whole world would come under this Davidic king, all would be well.

All of this is meant to signal to us just who this Jesus is and what his mission would be. Watch how, throughout his public life, how he gathers the tribes of Israel, going out to the woman at the well, to the man born blind, to Zacchaeus, and to the Gerasene demoniac. Notice how he engages in open table fellowship. Notice how he heals and forgives. He is not simply being a nice, inclusive fellow; he is doing what the Davidic Messiah was expected to do. He is gathering the nations in the new kingdom of God.

Blogger: 
Keep in mind that as David is king of Israel, Jesus Christ is King  of the Global Kiingdom whose extension is without limits, populated as intensely as the stars of the heavens and the sands on the shore[the promise made to Abram]. Christ, the God-man is the revelation and meaning of every man. There is only one anthropology and it is Christological. Therefore, there is no such thing as a natural man, nor a natural order. There is no morality that is merely "natural" as opposed to supernatural. Reality is ultimately Jesus Christ, one Person of two ontologically distinct natures, both dynamized by the one divine Person of the Son of the Father. In Christ, the Subject of all being, created and uncreated, is the divine Person of the Son. Christ is the re-starting of creation. Everything is new. It is divine (uncreated) and human (created). And everything takes its meaning from Him. The entire created physical cosmos is but the extension of his humanity that is His.
   And everything that precedes Christ in time in what we understand to be in a evolutionary way, is fulfilling what Paul wrote in Ephesians 1, 4: 'He predestined us to be adopted through Jesus Christ as his sons, according to the purpose of his will."

   Consider Newman on the seeds of truth having been scattered from the beginning of creation and within history, and so developing in time to maturity and emergence:“Now, the phenomenon, admitted on all hands, is this:—that great portion of what is generally received as Christian truth, is in its rudiments or in its separate parts to be found in heathen philosophies and religions. For instance, the doctrine of a Trinity is found both in the East and in the West; so is the ceremony of washing; so is the rite of sacrifice. The doctrine of the Divine Word is Platonic; the doctrine of the Incarnation is Indian; of a divine kingdom is Judaic; of Angels and demons is Magian; the connexion of sin with the body is Gnostic; celibacy is known to Bonze and Talapoin; a sacerdotal order is Egyptian; the idea of a new birth is Chinese and Eleusinian; belief in sacramental virtue is Pythagorean; and honours to the dead are a polytheism. Such is the general nature of the fact before us; Mr. Milman argues from it,—"These things are in heathenism, therefore they are not Christian:" we, on the contrary, prefer to say, "these things are in Christianity, therefore they are not heathen." That is, we prefer to say, and we think that Scripture bears us out in saying, that from the beginning the Moral Governor of the world has scattered the seeds of truth far and wide over its extent; that these have variously taken root, and grown up as in the wilderness, wild plants indeed but living; and hence that, as the inferior animals have tokens of an immaterial principle in them, yet have not [intellective: mine] souls, so the philosophies and religions of men have their life in certain true ideas, though they are not directly divine. What man is amid the brute creation, such is the Church among the schools of the world; and as Adam gave names to the animals about him, so has the Church from the first looked round upon the earth, noting and visiting the doctrines she found there. She began in Chaldea, and then sojourned among the Canaanites, and went down into Egypt, and thence passed into Arabia, till she rested in her own land. Next she encountered the merchants of Tyre, and the wisdom of the East country, and the luxury of Sheba. Then she was carried away to Babylon, and wandered to the schools of Greece [where she engendered Greek metaphysical thought from her revelation of creation: mine]. And wherever she went, in trouble or in triumph, still she was a living spirit, the mind and voice of the Most High; "sitting in the midst of the doctors, both hearing them and asking them questions;" claiming to herself what they said rightly, correcting their errors, supplying their defects, completing their beginnings, expanding their surmises, and thus gradually by means of them enlarging the range and refining the sense of her own teaching. So far then from her creed being of doubtful credit because it resembles foreign theologies, we even hold that one special way in which Providence has imparted divine knowledge to us has been by enabling her to draw and collect it together out of the world, and, in this sense, as in others, to suck the milk of the Gentiles and to suck the breast of kings.
“How far in fact this process has gone, is a question of history; and we believe it has before now been grossly exaggerated and misrepresented by those who, like Mr. Milman, have thought that its existence told against {233} Catholic doctrine; but so little antecedent difficulty have we in the matter, that we could readily grant, unless it were a question of fact not of theory, that Balaam was an Eastern sage, or a Sibyl was inspired, or Solomon learnt of the sons of Mahol, or Moses was a scholar of the Egyptian hierophants. We are not distressed to be told that the doctrine of the angelic host came from Babylon, while we know that they did sing at the Nativity; nor that the vision of a Mediator is in Philo, if in very deed He died for us on Calvary. Nor are we afraid to allow, that, even after His coming, the Church has been a treasure-house, giving forth things old and new, casting the gold of fresh tributaries into her refiner's fire, or stamping upon her own, as time required it, a deeper impress of her Master's image.
“The distinction between these two theories is broad and obvious. The advocates of the one imply that Revelation was a single, entire, solitary act, or nearly so, introducing a certain message; whereas we, who maintain the other, consider that Divine teaching has been in fact, what the analogy of nature would lead us to expect, "at sundry times and in divers manners," various, complex, progressive, and supplemental of itself. We consider the Christian doctrine, when analyzed, to appear, like the human frame, "fearfully and wonderfully made;" but they think it someone tenet or certain principles given out at one time in their fullness, without gradual enlargement before Christ's coming or elucidation afterwards. They cast off all that they also find in Pharisee or heathen; we conceive that the Church, like Aaron's rod, devours the serpents of the magicians. They are ever hunting for a fabulous primitive simplicity; we repose in Catholic fullness. They seek what never has been found; we accept and use {234} what even they acknowledge to be a substance. They are driven to maintain, on their part, that the Church's doctrine was never pure; we say that it never can be corrupt. We consider that a divine promise keeps the Church Catholic from doctrinal corruption; but on what promise, or on what encouragement, they are seeking for their visionary purity does not appear.”[1]

All of this is the Kingdom of God. That means that the Kingdom of God is a Person, with the face and name of Jesus of Nazareth" (Redemptoris Missio, #18). The Kingdom of God is not a political reality like a Christendom, but a Person. It is only by each becoming Christ by the sincere gift of self in the act of a living faith in ordinary secular life does the Kingdom become an intramundane reality. "If I cast out demons with the finger of God, then the Kingdom of God has come upon you" (Lk. 11, 20). This gives us a new eschatology where the Kingdom is not to come as Christ only at the end of time, the present being a "vale of tears." He, (the eschaton), is now in the present moment the source of joy insofar as each is in the process going out of self to become another Christ.

The Church is not the Kingdom. It is as the sacrament of the Kingdom. Therefore, we preach the Kingdom (Person of Christ). We build the Church as the sacrament ("God gathered together as one all those who in faith look upon Jesus as the author of salvation and the source of unity and peace, and established them as the Church that for each and all it may be the visible sacrament of this saving unity (LG#9 ) that brings Him forth in time.

Pope Francis: 

The Kingdom of God, and the Church are not only in the center but in the periphery as the people of God. Consider what Pope Francis says in Evangelii Gaudium #32-33 making reference to John Paul II's call for help in exercising the papacy: 

"Pope John Paul II asked for help in finding 'a way of exercising the primacy which, while in no way renouncing what is essential to its mission, is nonetheless open to a new situation.'[35] We have made little progress in this regard. The papacy and the central structures of the universal Church also need to hear the call to pastoral conversion. The Second Vatican Council stated that, like the ancient patriarchal Churches, episcopal conferences are in a position 'to contribute in many and fruitful ways to the concrete realization of the collegial spirit'.[36] Yet this desire has not been fully realized, since a juridical status of episcopal conferences which would see them as subjects of specific attributions, including genuine doctrinal authority, has not yet been sufficiently elaborated.[37] Excessive centralization, rather than proving helpful, complicates the Church’s life and her missionary outreach.

"33. Pastoral ministry in a missionary key seeks to abandon the complacent attitude that says: 'We have always done it this way.' I invite everyone to be bold and creative in this task of rethinking the goals, structures, style and methods of evangelization in their respective communities. A proposal of goals without an adequate communal search for the means of achieving them will inevitably prove illusory. I encourage everyone to apply the guidelines found in this document generously and courageously, without inhibitions or fear. The important thing is to not walk alone, but to rely on each other as brothers and sisters, and especially under the leadership of the bishops, in a wise and realistic pastoral discernment."

This is an enormously important statement. And this is what Francis is talking about in so far as not seeking for clerical says of power, but to seek new ways, sow new seeds that will yield their fruit in time.


   Now, the light of this, consider that Francis is moving the Church from a Roman centralism to a communio that is her proper physiognomy, under the authority of the pope. In spite of the impression that we all live with, the Church is not a monarchy although it has been styled on that (perhaps unconsciously). Nor is the Church a democracy. The Church is the image of the Trinitarian God, Who is One, yet each Person is God. We live and move within that Mystery.



[1] John Henry Newman, “Essays Critical and Historical,” XI: Milman’s View of Christianity (1871), vol. 2, 232-233.

Ratzinger on the Church as Communio:

It can certainly be said that, at the time of the extraordinary Synod of 1985, which was to attempt an evaluation of the 20 years following the Council, there appeared a new effort to sum up conciliar ecclesiology in a basic concept: the ecclesiology of communio. I received this new focus of ecclesiology with joy and did my best to prepare it. Even so, it should be recognized first of all that the word communio does not have a central position in the Council. But if it is properly understood it can serve as a synthesis for the essential elements of conciliar ecclesiology. All of the essential elements of the Christian concept of communio are combined in the famous text of I Jn 1, 3, which can be taken as the criterion for the correct Christian understanding of communion: "That which we have seen and heard we proclaim also to you, so that you also may have fellowship with us; and our fellowship is with the Father and with his Son Jesus Christ. And we are writing this that our joy may be complete". Here the starting point of communio is brought to the fore: the encounter with the Son of God, Jesus Christ, who comes to men and women through the Church's proclamation. So there arises communion among human beings, which in turn is based on communio with the Triune God. We have access to communion with God through the realization of the communion of God with man which is Christ in person; the encounter with Christ creates communion with him and thus with the Father in the Holy Spirit; and from this point unites human beings with one another. The purpose of all this is full joy: the Church carries an eschatological dynamic within her. In the words "full joy", we can glimpse a reference to the farewell discourse of Jesus, to the Easter mystery and to the return of the Lord in his Easter appearances, which prepare for his full return in the new world: "You will weep and lament, but the world will rejoice; you will be sorrowful, but your sorrow will turn into joy . . . I will see you again and your hearts will rejoice . . . ask, and you will receive, that your joy may be full" (Jn 16; 20; 22; 24). If the last sentence is compared with Lk 11,13 — the invitation to prayer in Luke — it clearly appears that "joy" and "Holy Spirit" are one and the same, and that the word "joy" in I Jn 1, 3, conceals the Holy Spirit who is not expressly mentioned here. The word communio therefore, based on the biblical context has a theological, Christological, salvation historical and ecclesiological character. It therefore has within it the sacramental dimension which in Paul appears explicitly: "The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not a participation in the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not a participation in the body of Christ? Because there is one Bread, we who are many are one body . . . " (I Cor 10, 16 f.). The ecclesiology of communion is a profoundly Eucharistic ecclesiology. It is thus very close to the Eucharistic ecclesiology, which Orthodox theologians have developed convincingly in our century. Ecclesiology becomes more concrete and at the same time remains totally spiritual, transcendent and eschatological. In the Eucharist Christ, present in the bread and wine and giving himself ever anew, builds the Church as his body and through his risen body unites us to the Triune God and to one another. The Eucharist is celebrated in different places, and yet at the same time it is universal, because there is only one Christ and only one body of Christ. The Eucharist includes the priestly service of the repraesentatio Christi and thus the network of service, the synthesis of unity and multiplicity, which is already expressed in the word communio. Thus it can be said without a doubt that the concept incorporates an ecclesiological synthesis, which unites the discourse on the Church with the discourse on God and with life from God and with God, a synthesis that takes up all the essential intentions of the Second Vatican Council's ecclesiology and connects them in the right way.
For these reasons I was grateful and pleased when the Synod of 1985 made the concept of communion once again the focus of reflection. However, the years that followed show that no word is safe from misunderstandings, not even the best and most profound.



  

Saturday, December 19, 2015

Bishop Robert Barron on Being The Mother of God: You


The German theologian and mystic Meister Eckhart saw something with great clarity—every Christian has the vocation of Mary, to bring Christ to birth. We each do this in our own way and style, according to the exigencies of our unique vocation. But we do this, he saw, the same way Mary did: by abandoning our projects and plans, our sense of the good life, and acquiescing to God’s purpose working through us. 

A Meditation by Blessed John Henry Newman


"God has created me to do Him some definite service; He has committed some work to me which He has not committed to another. I have my mission - I never may know it in this life,but I shall be told it in the next. Somehow I am necessary for His purposes, as necessary in my place as an Archangel in His. I have a part in this great work; I am a link in a chain, a bond of connection between persons. He has not created me for naught. I shall do good, I shall do His work; I shall be an angel of peace, a preacher of truth in my own place, while not intending it, if I do but keep His commandments and serve Him in my calling.

"Therefore, I will trust Him. Whatever, wherever I am, I can never be thrown away. If I am in sickness, my sickness may serve Him; in perplexity, my perplexity may serve Him; if I am in sorrow, my sorrow may serve Him. He does nothing in vain; He may prolong my life, He may shorten it; He knows what He is about. He may take away my friends, He may throw me among strangers, He may make me feel desolate, make my spirits sink, hide the future  from me - still He knows what He is about."

Thursday, December 17, 2015

Prayer and A Small Sacrifice for the Pope on His 79th


The best gift for the pope besides my above suggestion is to read him. He is the concretion of the last three popes and the Second Vatican Council. He is absolutely heroic in confronting the conversion of the Church to an Immanent Christ. His personal holiness is evident in his exercise of personal freedom and daring (parrhesia) in opening new historical directions to place Christ at the summit of all human activity starting with the family and all human labor including the economic, the politic, and the religious.Viva!

Lengthy But Valuable Read of the Pope on Peace

Pope Francis´ message for the World Day of Peace



OVERCOME INDIFFERENCE AND WIN PEACE
1.    God is not indifferent!  God cares about mankind!  God does not abandon us!  At the beginning of the New Year, I would like to share not only this profound conviction but also my cordial good wishes for prosperity, peace and the fulfilment of the hopes of every man and every woman, every family, people and nation throughout the world, including all Heads of State and Government and all religious leaders.  We continue to trust that 2016 will see us all firmly and confidently engaged, on different levels, in the pursuit of justice and peace.  Peace is both God’s gift and a human achievement.  As a gift of God, it is entrusted to all men and women, who are called to attain it.

    Maintaining our reasons for hope
2.    Sadly, war and terrorism, accompanied by kidnapping, ethnic or religious persecution and the misuse of power, marked the past year from start to finish.  In many parts of the world, these have became so common as to constitute a real "third world war fought piecemeal”.  Yet some events of the year now ending inspire me, in looking ahead to the new year, to encourage everyone not to lose hope in our human ability to conquer evil and to combat resignation and indifference.  They demonstrate our capacity to show solidarity and to rise above self-interest, apathy and indifference in the face of critical situations.

    Here I would mention the efforts to bring world leaders together at COP21 in the search for new ways to confront climate change and to protect the earth, our common home.  We can also think of two earlier global events: the Addis Ababa Summit for funding sustainable development worldwide and the adoption of the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, aimed at ensuring a more dignified standard of living for all the world’s peoples, especially the poor, by that year.

    For the Church, 2015 was a special year, since it marked the fiftieth anniversary of two documents of the Second Vatican Council which eloquently expressed her sense of solidarity with the world.  Pope John XXIII, at the beginning of the Council, wanted to open wide the windows of the Church and to improve her communication with the world.  The two documents, Nostra Aetate and Gaudium et Spes, are emblematic of the new relationship of dialogue, solidarity and accompaniment which the Church sought to awaken within the human family.  In the Declaration Nostra Aetate, the Church expressed her openness to dialogue with non-Christian religions.  In the Pastoral Constitution Gaudium et Spes, based on a recognition that "the joys and hopes, the grief and anguish of the people of our time, especially of those who are poor or afflicted, are the joys and hopes, the grief and anguish of the followers of Christ as well”,  the Church proposed to enter into dialogue with the entire human family about the problems of our world, as a sign of solidarity, respect and affection. 

    Along these same lines, with the present Jubilee of Mercy I want to invite the Church to pray and work so that every Christian will have a humble and compassionate heart, one capable of proclaiming and witnessing to mercy.  It is my hope that all of us will learn to "forgive and give”, to become more open "to those living on the outermost fringes of society - fringes which modern society itself creates”, and to refuse to fall into "a humiliating indifference or a monotonous routine which prevents us from discovering what is new!  Let us ward off destructive cynicism!” 

    There are many good reasons to believe in mankind’s capacity to act together in solidarity and, on the basis of our interconnection and interdependence, to demonstrate concern for the more vulnerable of our brothers and sisters and for the protection of the common good.  This attitude of mutual responsibility is rooted in our fundamental vocation to fraternity and a life in common.  Personal dignity and interpersonal relationships are what constitute us as human beings whom God willed to create in his own image and likeness.  As creatures endowed with inalienable dignity, we are related to all our brothers and sisters, for whom we are responsible and with whom we act in solidarity.  Lacking this relationship, we would be less human.  We see, then, how indifference represents a menace to the human family.  As we approach a new year, I would ask everyone to take stock of this reality, in order to overcome indifference and to win peace.

    Kinds of indifference
3.    Clearly, indifference is not something new; every period of history has known people who close their hearts to the needs of others, who close their eyes to what is happening around them, who turn aside to avoid encountering other people's problems.  But in our day, indifference has ceased to be a purely personal matter and has taken on broader dimensions, producing a certain "globalization of indifference”.

    The first kind of indifference in human society is indifference to God, which then leads to indifference to one’s neighbour and to the environment.  This is one of the grave consequences of a false humanism and practical materialism allied to relativism and nihilism.  We have come to to think that we are the source and creator of ourselves, our lives and society.  We feel self-sufficient, prepared not only to find a substitute for God but to do completely without him.  As a consequence, we feel that we owe nothing to anyone but ourselves, and we claim only rights.   Against this erroneous understanding of the person, Pope Benedict XVI observed that neither man himself nor human development can, on their own, answer the question of our ultimate meaning.   Paul VI likewise stated that "there is no true humanism but that which is open to the Absolute, and is conscious of a vocation which gives human life its authentic significance”. 

    Indifference to our neighbour shows itself in different ways.  Some people are well-informed; they listen to the radio, read the newspapers or watch television, but they do so mechanically and without engagement.  They are vaguely aware of the tragedies afflicting humanity, but they have no sense of involvement or compassion.  Theirs is the attitude of those who know, but keep their gaze, their thoughts and their actions focused on themselves.  Sadly, it must be said that today’s information explosion does not of itself lead to an increased concern for other people’s problems, which demands openness and a sense of solidarity.   Indeed, the information glut can numb people’s sensibilities and to some degree downplay the gravity of the problems.  There are those who "simply content themselves with blaming the poor and the poor countries themselves for their troubles; indulging in unwarranted generalizations, they claim that the solution is an ‘education’ that would tranquilize them, making them tame and harmless. All this becomes even more exasperating for the marginalized in the light of the widespread and deeply rooted corruption found in many countries – in their governments, businesses and institutions – whatever the political ideology of their leaders.” 

    In other cases, indifference shows itself in lack of concern for what is happening around us, especially if it does not touch us directly.  Some people prefer not to ask questions or seek answers; they lead lives of comfort, deaf to the cry of those who suffer.  Almost imperceptibly, we grow incapable of feeling compassion for others and for their problems; we have no interest in caring for them, as if their troubles were their own responsibility, and none of our business.   "When we are healthy and comfortable, we forget about others (something God the Father never does): we are unconcerned with their problems, their sufferings and the injustices they endure…  Our heart grows cold.  As long as I am relatively healthy and comfortable, I don’t think about those less well off.” 

    Because we dwell in a common home, we cannot help but ask ourselves about the state of its health, as I sought to do in Laudato Si’.  Water and air pollution, the indiscriminate exploitation of forests and the destruction of the natural environment are often the result of man’s indifference to man, since everything is interrelated.  Then too, there is the way we treat animals, which has an effect on the way we treat other people , and the cases where people freely do elsewhere what they would never dare do at home. 

    In these and in other situations, indifference leads to self-absorption and a lack of commitment.  It thus contributes to the absence of peace with God, with our neighbour and with the environment.

    Peace threatened by globalized indifference
4.    Indifference towards God transcends the purely private sphere of the individual and affects the public and social sphere.  As Benedict XVI pointed out, "the glorification of God and human peace on earth are closely linked”.   Indeed, "without openness to the transcendent, human beings easily become prey to relativism and find it difficult to act justly and to work for peace.   Disregard and the denial of God, which lead man to acknowledge no norm above himself and himself alone, have produced untold cruelty and violence. 

    On both the individual and communitarian levels, indifference to one’s neighbour, born of indifference to God, finds expression in disinterest and a lack of engagement, which only help to prolong situations of injustice and grave social imbalance.  These in turn can lead to conflicts or, in any event, generate a climate of dissatisfaction which risks exploding sooner or later into acts of violence and insecurity.

    Indifference and lack of commitment constitute a grave dereliction of the duty whereby each of us must work in accordance with our abilities and our role in society for the promotion of the common good, and in particular for peace, which is one of mankind’s most precious goods. 

    On the institutional level, indifference to others and to their dignity, their fundamental rights and their freedom, when it is part of a culture shaped by the pursuit of profit and hedonism, can foster and even justify actions and policies which ultimately represent threats to peace.  Indifference can even lead to justifying deplorable economic policies which breed injustice, division and violence for the sake of ensuring the wellbeing of individuals or nations.  Not infrequently, economic and political projects aim at securing or maintaining power and wealth, even at the cost of trampling on the basic rights and needs of others.  When people witness the denial of their elementary rights, such as the right to food, water, health care or employment, they are tempted to obtain them by force. 

    Moreover, indifference to the natural environment, by countenancing deforestation, pollution and natural catastrophes which uproot entire communities from their ecosystem and create profound insecurity, ends up creating new forms of poverty and new situations of injustice, often with dire consequences for security and peace.  How many wars have been fought, and how many will continue to be fought, over a shortage of goods or out of an insatiable thirst for natural resources? 

    From indifference to mercy: the conversion of hearts
5.    One year ago, in my Message for the 2015 World Day of Peace, with the motto "No Longer Slaves, but Brothers and Sisters”, I evoked the first biblical icon of human brotherhood, that of Cain and Abel (cf. Gen 4:1-16).  I meant to draw attract attention to how from the very beginning this original brotherhood was betrayed.  Cain and Abel were brothers.  Both came forth from the same womb, they were equal in dignity and created in the image and likeness of God; but their relationship as brothers was destroyed.  "It was not only that Cain could not stand Abel he killed him out of envy.”   Fratricide was the form of betrayal, and Cain’s refusal to acknowledge Abel as his brother became the first rupture in the family relations of fraternity, solidarity and mutual respect.

    God then intervened to remind man of his responsibility towards his fellows, as he had also done when Adam and Eve, our first parents, ruptured their relationship with him, their Creator.  "Then the Lord said to Cain: "Where is Abel your brother?”  He said, "I do not know; am I my brother’s keeper?”  But the Lord replied: "What you have you done? The voice of your brother’s blood is crying to me from the ground” (Gen 4:9-10).

    Cain said he did not know what had happened to his brother, that he was not his brother’s keeper.  He did not feel responsible for his life, for his fate.  He did not feel involved.  He was indifferent to his brother, despite their common origin.  How sad!  What a sorry tale of brothers, of families, of human beings!  This was the first display of indifference between brothers.  God, however, is not indifferent.  Abel’s blood had immense value in his eyes, and he asked Cain to give an account of it.  At the origin of the human race, God shows himself to be involved in man’s destiny.  Later, when the children of Israel were slaves in Egypt, God once more intervened to tell Moses: "I have seen the affliction of my people who are in Egypt, and have heard their cry because of their taskmasters; I know their sufferings, and I have come down to deliver them out of the hand of the Egyptians, and to bring them up out of that land to a good and broad land, a land flowing with milk and honey” (Ex 3:7-8).  We should note the verbs which describe God’s intervention: he sees, hears, knows, comes down and delivers.  God does not remain indifferent.  He is attentive and he acts.

    In the same way, in Jesus his Son, God has come down among us.  He took flesh and showed his solidarity with humanity in all things but sin.  Jesus identified with us: he became "the first-born among many brethren” (Rom 8:29).  He was not content merely to teach the crowds, but he was concerned for their welfare, especially when he saw them hungry (cf. Mk 6:34-44) or without work (cf. Mt 20:3).  He was concerned not only for men and women, but also for the fish of the sea, the birds of the air, plants and trees, all things great and small.  He saw and embraced all of creation.  But he did more than just see; he touched people’s lives, he spoke to them, helped them and showed kindness to those in need.  Not only this, but he felt strong emotions and he wept (cf. Jn 11:33-44).  And he worked to put an end to suffering, sorrow, misery and death. 

    Jesus taught us to be merciful like our heavenly Father (cf. Lk 6:36).  In the parable of the Good Samaritan (cf. Lk 10:29-37), he condemned those who fail to help others in need, those who "pass by on the other side” (cf. Lk 10:31-32).  By this example, he taught his listeners, and his disciples in particular, to stop and to help alleviate the sufferings of this world and the pain of our brothers and sisters, using whatever means are at hand, beginning with our own time, however busy we may be.  Indifference often seeks excuses: observing ritual prescriptions, looking to all the things needing to be done, hiding behind hostilities and prejudices which keep us apart.

    Mercy is the heart of God.  It must also be the heart of the members of the one great family of his children: a heart which beats all the more strongly wherever human dignity – as a reflection of the face of God in his creatures – is in play.  Jesus tells us that love for others – foreigners, the sick, prisoners, the homeless, even our enemies – is the yardstick by which God will judge our actions.  Our eternal destiny depends on this.  It is not surprising that the Apostle Paul tells the Christians of Rome to rejoice with those who rejoice and to weep with those who weep (cf. Rom 12:15), or that he encourages the Corinthians to take up collections as a sign of solidarity with the suffering members of the Church (cf. 1 Cor 16:2-3).  And Saint John writes: "If any one has the world’s goods and sees his brother or sister in need, yet refuses help, how does God’s love abide in him? (1 Jn 3:17; cf. Jas 2:15-16). 

    This then is why "it is absolutely essential for the Church and for the credibility of her message that she herself live and testify to mercy.  Her language and her gestures must transmit mercy, so as to touch the hearts of all people and inspire them once more to find the road that leads to the Father.  The Church’s first truth is the love of Christ.  The Church makes herself a servant of this love and mediates it to all people: a love that forgives and expresses itself in the gift of oneself.  Consequently, wherever the Church is present, the mercy of the Father must be evident. In our parishes, communities, associations and movements, in a word, wherever there are Christians, everyone should find an oasis of mercy.” 

    We too, then, are called to make compassion, love, mercy and solidarity a true way of life, a rule of conduct in our relationships with one another.   This requires the conversion of our hearts: the grace of God has to turn our hearts of stone into hearts of flesh (cf. Ezek 36:26), open to others in authentic solidarity.  For solidarity is much more than a "feeling of vague compassion or shallow distress at the misfortunes of so many people, both near and far”.   Solidarity is "a firm and persevering determination to commit oneself to the common good; that is to say to the good of all and of each individual, because we are all really responsible for all”,  because compassion flows from fraternity.

    Understood in this way, solidarity represents the moral and social attitude which best corresponds to an awareness of the scourges of our own day, and to the growing interdependence, especially in a globalized world, between the lives of given individuals and communities and those of other men and women in the rest of the world. 

    Building a culture of solidarity and mercy to overcome indifference
6.    Solidarity, as a moral virtue and social attitude born of personal conversion, calls for commitment on the part of those responsible for education and formation.

    I think first of families, which are called to a primary and vital mission of education.  Families are the first place where the values of love and fraternity, togetherness and sharing, concern and care for others are lived out and handed on.  They are also the privileged milieu for transmitting the faith, beginning with those first simple gestures of devotion which mothers teach their children. 

    Teachers, who have the challenging task of training children and youth in schools or other settings, should be conscious that their responsibility extends also to the moral, spiritual and social aspects of life.  The values of freedom, mutual respect and solidarity can be handed on from a tender age.  Speaking to educators, Pope Benedict XVI noted that: "Every educational setting can be a place of openness to the transcendent and to others a place of dialogue, cohesiveness and attentive listening, where young people feel appreciated for their personal abilities and inner riches, and can learn to esteem their brothers and sisters. May young people be taught to savour the joy which comes from the daily exercise of charity and compassion towards others and from taking an active part in the building of a more humane and fraternal society”. 

    Communicators also have a responsibility for education and formation, especially nowadays, when the means of information and communication are so widespread.  Their duty is first and foremost to serve the truth, and not particular interests.  For the media "not only inform but also form the minds of their audiences, and so they can make a significant contribution to the education of young people.  It is important never to forget that the connection between education and communication is extremely close: education takes place through communication, which influences, for better or worse, the formation of the person.” 

    Communicators should also be mindful that the way in which information is obtained and made public should always be legally and morally admissible.

    Peace: the fruit of a culture of solidarity, mercy and compassion
7.    While conscious of the threat posed by a globalization of indifference, we should also recognize that, in the scenario I have just described, there are also many positive initiatives which testify to the compassion, mercy and solidarity of which we are capable.

    Here I would offer some examples of praiseworthy commitment, which demonstrate how all of us can overcome indifference in choosing not to close our eyes to our neighbour.  These represent good practices on the way to a more humane society.

    There are many non-governmental and charitable organizations, both within and outside the Church, whose members, amidst epidemics, disasters and armed conflicts, brave difficulties and dangers in caring for the injured and sick, and in burying the dead.  I would also mention those individuals and associations which assist migrants who cross deserts and seas in search of a better life.  These efforts are spiritual and corporal works of mercy on which we will be judged at the end of our lives.

    I think also of the journalists and photographers who shape public opinion on difficult situations which trouble our consciences, and all those devoted to the defence of human rights, especially the rights of ethnic and religious minorities, indigenous peoples, women and children, and the most vulnerable of our brothers and sisters.  Among them are also many priests and missionaries who, as good pastors, remain at the side of their flock and support them, heedless of danger and hardship, especially during armed conflicts.

    How many families, amid occupational and social difficulties, make great sacrifices to provide their children with a "counter-cultural” education in the values of solidarity, compassion and fraternity!  How many families open their hearts and homes to those in need, such as refugees and migrants!  I wish to thank in a particular way all those individuals, families, parishes, religious communities, monasteries and shrines who readily responded to my appeal to welcome a refugee family. 

 Finally, I would mention those young people who join in undertaking works of solidarity, and all those who generously help their neighbours in need in their cities and countries and elsewhere in the world.  I thank and encourage everyone engaged in such efforts, which often pass unobserved.  Their hunger and thirst for justice will be satisfied, their mercy will lead them to find mercy and, as peacemakers, they will be called children of God (cf. Mt 5:6-9). 

    Peace in the sign of the Jubilee of Mercy
8.    In the spirit of the Jubilee of Mercy, all of us are called to realize how indifference can manifest itself in our lives and to work concretely to improve the world around us, beginning with our families, neighbours and places of employment.
    Civil society is likewise called to make specific and courageous gestures of concern for their most vulnerable members, such as prisoners, migrants, the unemployed and the infirm. 

    With regard to prisoners, it would appear that in many cases practical measures are urgently needed to improve their living conditions, with particular concern for those detained while awaiting trial.   It must be kept in mind that penal sanctions have the aim of rehabilitation, while national laws should consider the possibility of other establishing penalties than incarceration.  In this context, I would like once more to appeal to governmental authorities to abolish the death penalty where it is still in force, and to consider the possibility of an amnesty. 

    With regard to migrants, I would ask that legislation on migration be reviewed, so, while respecting reciprocal rights and responsibilities, it can reflect a readiness to welcome migrants and to facilitate their integration.  Special concern should be paid to the conditions for legal residency, since having to live clandestinely can lead to criminal behaviour. 

    In this Jubilee Year, I would also appeal to national leaders for concrete gestures in favour of our brothers and sisters who suffer from the lack of labour, land and lodging.  I am thinking of the creation of dignified jobs to combat the social plague of unemployment, which affects many families and young people, with grave effects for society as a whole.  Unemployment takes a heavy toll on people’s sense of dignity and hope, and can only be partially compensated for by welfare benefits, however necessary these may be, provided to the unemployed and their families.  Special attention needs to be given to women – who unfortunately still encounter discrimination in the workplace – and to some categories of workers whose conditions are precarious or dangerous, and whose pay is not commensurate to the importance of their social mission.

    Finally, I express my hope that effective steps will be taken to improve the living conditions of the sick by ensuring that all have access to medical treatment and pharmaceuticals essential for life, as well as the possibility of home care. 
    Looking beyond their own borders, national leaders are also called to renew their relations with other peoples and to enable their real participation and inclusion in the life of the international community, in order to ensure fraternity within the family of nations as well.

    With this in mind, I would like to make a threefold appeal to the leaders of nations: to refrain from drawing other peoples into conflicts or wars which destroy not only their material, cultural and social legacy, but also – and in the long term – their moral and spiritual integrity; to forgive or manage in a sustainable way the international debt of the poorer nations; and to adopt policies of cooperation which, instead of bowing before the dictatorship of certain ideologies, will respect the values of local populations and, in any case, not prove detrimental to the fundamental and inalienable right to life of the unborn.

    I entrust these reflections, together with my best wishes for the New Year, to the intercession of the Blessed Virgin Mary, our Mother, who cares for the needs of our human family, that she may obtain from her Son Jesus, the Prince of Peace, the granting of our prayers and the blessing of our daily efforts for a fraternal and united world.

From the Vatican, 8 December 2015
Solemnity of the Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary
Opening of the Extraordinary Jubilee of Mercy 

Wednesday, December 16, 2015

The Present Need of the Church To Go to the Roots To Know Rightly

   I cite the below in the face of the brouhaha that appears around Pope Francis for his ongoing reform of the Church, i.e. the paranoia of the "conservative" and the fantasy of the "liberal." Both are working in a superficiality apart from the knowledge of the heart. Hence, The Year of Mercy.

* * * * * 

Archbishop John R. Quinn writes that the first clearly attested synod was held in the year AD 175 to deal with the Montanist heresy. This heresy, named after its leader, Montanus, may be described in simple terms as a combination of severity and exuberance. It was excessively rigorous in moral and ascetical matters, requiring married people to separate or to live in continence. On the other hand, its adherents indulged in demonstrative display of alleged invasion by the Holy Spirit.”[1]
             
   From the very beginning the Church had to decide “the blazing controversy over the Law of Moses, in particular, the dietary laws and the religious rite of circumcision.””How did the Church resolve this problem?” Quinn answers: “looking into the New Testament, we see that there were three factors involved in settling the problem: pastoral experience, the appeal to Scripture, and the Jerusalem meeting of the leaders. No one of these three factors alone determined the solution; they were all interrelated
       
         “The relationship between doctrine and pastoral experience was of crucial important. The solution to the controversy did not come simply from an abstract examination of doctrinal principles. It was through and in the pastoral experience of the exemplary Christian life of the Gentiles whom Paul baptized without the requirement of circumcision, and of the outpouring of the Spirit on Cornelius and his Gentile friends as soon as Peter had preached the Gospel to them (Acts 10), that a singularly important doctrinal development took place in the Church. This doctrinal development occurred because the Church discerned between God working in the existential situation of the Church and her actual experience. Further, the searing controversy over the freedom of Gentle Christians from the Law powerfully dramatized that discernment is not easy. In this New Testament concern, the plan of God for the Church was discerned only after long, arduous search and controversy. The path was not self-evident.”

               Quinn then remarks: “This crisis of the primitive Church stands as a perpetual warning to the Church of every age that it cannot expect to find easy of quick solutions to its doctrinal and pastoral problems any more than the primitive Church did.”

               The first converts to the Church are Jews prone to the fundamentalism of the Law as evidenced in all the encounters of Our Lord with the Judaism of His day. It is not surprising that both reactions occur: rigorism on the one hand and enthusiastic laxism after His departure on the other. The criterion of truth centered on the real can only take place where there is an experience of lived faith – an experience of self-transcendence – which is an experience of the Person of Christ as Revelation of the Father. After the split of the Church in 1054 as East (Constantinople) and West (Rome), there is an eventual shallowing of experiential depth that eventually spawns Jansenism as an elitist pharisaical rigorism, which is immediately countered by the appearance of the Lord to St. Margaret Mary: “Jesus Christ, my kind Master, appeared to me. He was a blaze of glory – his five wounds shining like five suns, flames issuing from all parts of his human form, especially from his divine breast which was like a furnace, and which he opened to disclose this utterly affectionate and loveable Heart, the living source of all those flames. It was at this moment that he revealed to me the indescribable wonders of his pure love for mankind: the extravagance to which he’d been led for those who had nothing for him but ingratitude and indifference. ‘This hurts me more that everything I suffered in my passion. Even a little love from them in return – and I should regard all that I have done for them as next to nothing, and look for a way of doing still more.”[2]
                The above may be of some help in considering what Pope Francis is doing until now and with the “Year of Mercy.”



[1] Archbishop John R. Quinn, “Ever Ancient, Ever New,” Paulist Press (2013) 2,3.
[2] “Heart of the Redeemer: An Apologia for the Contemporary and Perennial Value of the Devotion to the Sacred Heart of Jesus,” Ignatius (1989) 135.

Monday, December 14, 2015

Robert Barron - Joy As Command

Ask for Joy
In his letter to the Philippians, a people with whom Paul felt a special closeness, he says, “Rejoice in the Lord always! I say it again, rejoice!” (Philippians 4:4). Notice first of all that this is a command: Do it. Rejoice. Joy comes when we actively do it. It is not a matter of sitting around waiting for some emotional state to come over you.

But what makes this possible? To rejoice, we must first put away selfishness and learn to love. When we find ourselves joyless or listless, often the best thing we can do is some concrete act of love.

What do I mean by that? Look again to the Gospel: “Let the man with two coats give to him who has none. The man who has food should do the same” (Luke 3:11). It’s pretty clear and pretty basic: Give your life away to those in need.

Next Paul says, “Dismiss all anxiety from your minds. The Lord himself is near” (Philippians 4:5). One of the obstacles to joy is that we convince ourselves we are finally in charge of our lives. It is up to us to know everything, to control everything. And what does all of this frenzy produce? Usually more anxiety and less joy.

That's why Paul tells his beloved Philippians that the key to joy is turning your life over to God, trusting in him, having confidence that he will lead you.

This is the way of all of the saints. Listen again to Paul: “Present your needs to God in every form of prayer and in petitions full of gratitude” (Philippians 4:6). God delights in caring for us, and he wants us to ask for joy. Again and again in the New Testament we are urged to do exactly this. As a sign of our dependence upon God and a token of confidence, we are invited to ask and ask and ask.